David J. Jones v. Eric K. Shinseki, Opinion Number 11-2704,
decided October 26, 2012 concerns the impact of medicine on a rating.
Specifically, the veteran sought a rate higher than 10% for
IBS. The Board considered the factors
identified in the rating schedule but then also considered the fact that
medication afforded the veteran some relief from his symptoms.
The veteran argued consideration of relief afforded by
medicine is not addressed in the rating schedule and should not be
considered. The VA argued the rating
schedule does not differentiate between a claimant’s condition with or without medicine
and thus it can look at the impact of medicine.
The Court held the Board committed legal error by
considering the effects of medication on the veteran’s IBS when those effects
are not explicitly contemplated by the rating criteria. The Court thought it important that the VA
has addressed the effect of medications in other factors, but did not do so
regarding this veteran’s disability. The
Court also noted the VA could fix the problem by amending the relevant rating criteria or by
adopting a general regulation addressing the effects of medicine.
The decision is important because it gives arguments to a
veteran who the VA is trying to rate when the disability is being treated by
medicine and thus at its best. However, it
is incumbent on veterans and their advocates to make sure the VA is not
ignoring the law and applying the effect of medicine when the rating schedule does not address medicine.
Decided by Judges Lance, Davis and Pietsch.
No comments:
Post a Comment